Not everyone was disappointed by Toronto's failed Olympic bid.
For Toronto author Hal Niedzviecki, too many people were
too busy selling The Games, at any cost
On a snowy winter evening last year, I stumbled into a news conference
trumpeting the "Arts and Culture" angle of the Toronto
2008 Olympic bid. Like most Torontonians, I had been casually
following the bid, reading the newspaper reports, biking under
the ubiquitous 2008 logo-festooned banners. So when I was invited
to this event, I decided to do my citizenly duty and check out
the proceedings firsthand.
Held in the bowels of a Yonge Street theatre, the gathering consisted
of bland speeches from bronze medallists and vaguely recognizable
retired artists, the presentation of an oversized game-show cheque
from the usually tightfisted government of Ontario and an ethnically
correct array of children strategically displayed onstage like
flowers in a vase. There was something about the commissioning
of an official Toronto Olympics song, something about a teen camp
featuring kids from all over the world and very little about the
living, breathing arts that make Toronto one of the most vital
cities in North America. The news conference, as insipid as a
we-are-the-world charity pop song, told me nothing about how the
bid organizers would present Toronto culture to the global masses
and a lot about the bid organizers' worldwide publicity scheme.
The Toronto Olympic bid was essentially put together behind closed
doors by a wealthy elite (is there any other kind?). Concerned
that their train not be derailed by such piddling issues as poverty
and cost overruns, they got the jump on detractors with a multi-year
campaign designed to show us how the Olympics will revitalize
the city and make everyone oodles of cash. Not a day went by without
us hearing some tidbit conducted by the Summer Games 2008 marching
band glee club. A seemingly endless stream of favourable polls
was obligingly regurgitated by the daily press with the urgency
usually reserved for shoot-ups and pop stars. Apparently, 70 or
64 or 99 per cent of Torontonians or Haligonians or work-to-rule
teachers or disaffected nurses or guys sleeping on grates on Bay
Street supported, craved and were desperate to have the Olympics.
Meanwhile, the good people of Toronto were subjected to a fusillade
of ads, trinkets and, of course, requisite Internet bumf. A June
21 "article" on an updated daily Toronto Summer Games
Web site started: "Public support is a big part of any Bid
City's campaign. Inspired by many of our readers who send us e-mail
daily with questions about pins and souvenirs. . . ." The
city can't win the Olympics or keep its emergency rooms open,
was embarrassed in front of the whole world by Mayor Mel's boiled-in-water-in-Africa
verbal effluvia even as it spent millions of public and private
dollars flying bigwigs all over the world, but the real story
here is citizen demand for a variety of brooches!
Throughout the bid process, we citizens were treated not as equal
partners with a say and a vote, but as minority stakeholders never
shown the whole picture. One independent chartered accountant
who assessed bid finances predicted a possible $1-billion deficit.
This didn't prevent city council from endorsing the bid 54 to
2 with nothing but the guarantee that the people of Ontario (including,
presumably, Toronto) would end up taping up windows and paying
the global phone bill after the party. Past Olympics overruns
were in the billions. "Successful" Sydney spent at least
$1.3 billion more than predicted, and we won't even bring up Montreal.
But, hey, why worry? See this giant cheque? See the spectacle
of Chretien, Harris and Lastman (working together for the first
time ever) dangling $1.5 billion in waterfront-development dollars
before the only city in North America whose chronically underfunded
transit system runs solely with municipal funds? Now that's the
Olympic spirit at work, and if you don't like it you can send
an e-mail to our Web site and we'll have one of our customer service
representatives contact you within 48 hours to respond to all
your misguided concerns. Just keep your mouth shut in a smile,
lest your complaints cause the slowly declining stocks to suddenly
plummet.
And make no mistake: Toronto's stock has been falling. There are
the obvious menu items such as crippling urban sprawl (comes with
side orders of thick smog and traffic snarls), skyrocketing housing
costs (would you like highrise Scarborough ghettos and property
tax increases for dessert?) and shaky public services (free with
your meal: a scenic ride past school fields pleasantly barren
of cluttering after-class activities). We can't hold the bid responsible
for all our city's woes. But we can certainly argue that a bid
for the Olympics is hardly the answer to a blundered forced amalgamation,
successive years of riots, protests and strikes, declining services
and rising costs, and professional sports teams that raise their
prices without delivering the prizes. Is it any wonder that we
Torontonians are tired, exhausted, stricken with a post-Olympics-bid
malaise? And who can blame us?
Last week, I left my apartment, passed the man sleeping on cardboard
in the alley and waited for the streetcar next to a giant sidewalk
pothole at least three months old (it would only get fixed after
someone fell in it). Meanwhile, more than 200 Toronto bid representatives
were in Moscow for a final $2-million party to push the bid. The
entourage included Jean, Mike and Mel as well as the standard
indigenous people's representation. (Who can blame the Mississaugas
of the New Credit native band for accepting a swank free trip
to Russia?) Did I mention the all-night bid bash featuring free
bands, laser show and breakfast at an entertainment complex on
Lake Ontario? So much effort and expense, but for what?
Don't pity the bid builders. Theirs may have been a futile task,
but they were well fed, well entertained, well paid. Pity the
people of Toronto, whose town isn't what it used to be, whose
unrelenting problems were obscured and possibly exacerbated by
a doomed Olympic bid that spent millions convincing us it would
be a privilege to lose billions.
After finally being liberated from the so-called Arts and Culture
news conference, I strolled along Yonge, thinking about a closed-doors
process that paid pretend homage to discussion and inclusivity
while sticking us with the bill for a 600-page doorstop of a bid
book, and that much less money and initiative to deal with the
next strike, arrogant downloading or mayoral gaffe. I was cold
and tired. But the snow was swirling around the flashing lights,
covering up the fissures threatening to crack the foundations.
A buoyant young couple threw handfuls of white powder at each
other, whooping and running past the crowded restaurants and bars.
This was the energy of the city I love, the vitality that our
bid builders figured they could harness to their promises. Walking
up the longest street in the world, I thought to myself, What
if we could harness that energy, use it to deal with, not deflect,
our problems? What if, after a long sleep, we could wake up out
of the Olympic bid hangover and finally get down to the business
of rebuilding? In a city used to repeated disappointments, we
residents of Toronto cling to the past and the future, wait for
the present bad news to diminish like just another smog warning.