At a recent book launch, Gutter Press publisher Sam Hiyate introduced
his latest discovery, the writer Tamara Faith Berger. Instead of
extolling her novella's spectacular prose and poignant insights into the
human condition, he informed the crowd that he published the book
because it turned him on. As he explains: "I told them that as a
publisher you want to get a mental hard-on, but in the case of Tamara's
book, it was great, because it came with the physical accompaniment."
Where once such frankness might have shocked and horrified staid Upper
Canada, Hiyate's lewd public pronouncement was met with applause and
appreciative chuckles.
At a time when graphicrepresentations of sexuality are abundantly
evident in the mainstream -- from magazines to television to billboards
to morning talk radio -- a book sold as sexually shocking seems like
business as usual. Porn is estimated to be a 15 billion dollar industry
in cultural ground zero the USA, and even in a slightly more restrictive
Canada, sex shops offer courses on the best way to please a woman and
the fetish porn banned at the border is just a mouse click away. As
Hiyate puts it, "Pornography is mainstream, pornography is culture."
This is a far cry from the days when an artist seeking to push the
boundaries could easily turn to sex. Books like Lady Chatterley's Lover
by D.H. Lawrence, the Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller, Erica Jong's
Fear of Flying, and even pulp like Kathleen Windsor's Forever Amber and
Grace Metalious's Peyton Place found instant cachet when, in the course
of challenging the established mores, they garnered bans and outrage.
But today, we live in a time where not just the representation of sex,
but the act of sex itself, is rampant, readily available. For a price,
you can watch anything. For a higher price, you can do anything.
Everyone from artists, novelists, and filmmakers to scholars and crusty
journalists, seems unsure how to represent this new climate -- the
question where do we go from here has rarely been more urgent.
Enter Tamara Faith Berger's first book, Lie With Me. In bridging the
gap between diary, porn, confession, erotica and literature, this
surreal psychological thriller operates with the assumption that there
are no boundaries left to break down. This book, with a plot consisting
of a series of seemingly random and often violent sex acts recounted
from the point of view of a nameless nymphomaniac, constantly reminds us
that we aren't supposed to be shocked anymore. With its pink cover and
crude cartoon drawings, it is even packaged to look like it belongs in
the children's section, further reinforcing both its provocative nature
and our ambivalent reaction to it. After all, we are constantly hearing
about some solitary pervert caught in the act of dispensing real child
porn. So how likely is it that we'll be appalled by Gutter Press'
posturing?
Nevertheless, trapped in the increasingly hazy world between porn and
pop culture, Lie With Me manages to push the reader's buttons. Though
graphic representations of sex are readily available and something like
700 million pornographic movies were rented in the US last year, there
remains a sense of shame and denial: Maxim and Cosmo give us scantily
clad models, but always with the pretense that underlying it all is our
quest for good clean everlasting love. Despite the legendary openness of
our society, we remain unsure how to react to a book that truly captures
the wanton anonymous carnal energy of a sex obsessed culture: "We both
straightened our backs, like we were bracing ourselves. All my flesh
pulled towards his flesh. I gulped my drink and banged for more. "More!"
I shouted. More! More! More! I started rubbing that guy with my fist up
and down under the bar."
Even Berger seems unsure what kind of response her book will, or
should, garner. "I don't find what I do to be gratuitous," she says,
"but in as much as it is gratuitous, I feel a certain amount of shame."
Berger, who grew up in a middle class Toronto suburb, was inspired to
write Lie With Me after a two year stint penning dirty stories for what
she describes as the "lower rungs of pornography" -- newsprint magazines
replete with grainy pictures.
"I spent years learning the genre, and it was fascinating to me," she
explains. "I liked the form, but it wasn't enough. This book was a way
to express myself with that craft. I wanted to make it better, I wanted
it to be for myself."
The search for self is at the heart of not just Berger's book, but an
explosion of cultural doings that seek, in some way, to merge the
increasingly pedestrian pornographic with personal sensibilities of
lust, loss and even shame. So far, this year in Canada alone, we have
Berger's book, plus Patricia Anderson's Passion Lost: Public Sex,
Private Desire in the Twentieth Century, and Simona Choise's upcoming
Good Girls Do: Sex Chronicles of a Shameless Generation. The recent
publishing past includes The End of Gay, Bert Archer's commentary on the
blurring of homo and hetero; Michael Turner's novel The Pornographer's
Poem, a coming of age set to a backdrop of amateur porn and a suburban
animal sex scene; Bill Brownstein's Sex Carnival, a romp through the
global sex village with stops to visit prostitutes, the kids behind
raunchy rave tabloid Vice, and Hugh Hefner.
Moving outside literary circles, Toronto festival Hot Docs recently
screened the Paul Cowan directed NFB film Give Me Your Soul, Canada's
contribution to the booming sub-genre of documentaries chronicling the
porn industry. Last year Montreal's Nadine Norman made waves in the art
world when her Call Girl performance art piece was put on at the
Canadian Cultural Centre in Paris. Before opening day, 10,000 cards were
distributed around the city. They read: "Call Girl. 100 per cent
dialogue. Free encounters by appointment." When people arrived at the
centre for their appointment, they discovered, as Norman told the
Montreal Gazette, "that Call Girl was an interactive art piece:
30-minute conversations with provocatively dressed actresses in a
boudoir-like setting. Callers who chose to participate were given
appointments. Callers searching for interactions of a more sexual nature
were directed elsewhere."
New York based Canadian artist Charmaine Wheatley recently reenacted
a performance in Winnipeg that consists of her entering strip clubs and
taking off her clothes while standing at the bar. Sometimes she is
invited up on stage, other times she is thrown out. Either way, the
events are documented for posterity on video. Wheatley doesn't seem to
know what she is trying to prove. As she explained in art mag Border
Crossings, "Maybe I like looking at the ladies. Could be that. Maybe I
like looking at the guys looking at the ladies; maybe I like looking at
the guys; maybe I get off on the bright lights and the glitter and the
glamour; maybe I get off on the superficial sex stuff, the marketing and
the manufacturing of sexuality."
Wheatley's ambivalence is notable and hardly uncommon. It is similar
to the way Berger, whether her publisher knows it or not, is leading the
way toward a re-examination of sexuality, though her accomplishment is
not about writing dirty. As she admits: "It's not shocking to anyone."
Rather, the book, like so much of this work, is about the after-shock.
It's about what happens after you fall into that yawning chasm of
anything-goes post-millennia culture, only to realize that lust and
liberation are not necessarily what they seem to be.
To be released this summer, Simona Choise's book Good Girls Do is
practically a non- fiction companion piece to Berger's novella. In the
book, Choise ponders her sexual psychology while visiting lesbian bath
houses, dominatrixes, high-end call girls and strip-clubs. Choise also
mixes genres, incorporating memoir, diary, and journalism into her
narrative. But at the crux of this book is Choise's quest for her own
sexual self in an age of permeable permissible sexual identity.
"As I was writing this book," she says, "what came into question for
me was: what do I want my relationships to look like when I get older?
What's important for me in terms of preserving my sexual freedom? But at
the same time I realized that surfing from one relation to the next in
pursuit of sexual kicks wasn't cutting it on an emotional level...as
exciting as that can be when you're young."
Choise, ultimately, both revels in and blames the seemingly endless
proliferation of sexual options she recounts in the book, writing that:
"We're not giving up much by loosening our sexual mores. Or are we? Does
losing the thrill of the forbidden, the suggestion, and the flirtation,
count as a loss? Does not knowing the feel of leather that's been used
against your body count as a loss?"
Last year, Bill Brownstein wrote what appears to be a very similar
book -- he, too, interviews various sex workers and sex enthusiasts and
tries to make sense of the changing cultural landscape which gives us
naked news and naked carwashes. But Brownstein, a Montreal Gazette city
columnist for more than fifteen years, is more voyeur than participant --
he cruises through the sex carwash with the windows up.
"Sex Carnival wasn't intended to condemn or condone," he says.
"People used to believe that this kind of stuff was practised only by
the trench coat types, but when you see the thousands of people at the
porno Oscars and sex trades shows you realize it's a huge industry --
it's not an aberration."
Similarly, the Vancouver writer Patricia Anderson takes great pains
to point out that her recently published book Passion Lost is not trying
to suggest that society should or could move back to more stringent
control over matters sexual. Anderson, who shares the baby boomer
demographic with Brownstein, also shares his reticence -- neither book
conveys the sense of openness, vulnerability and quest that mark the
works of Choise, Berger, and performance artists like Wheatley and
Norman. Anderson, like Brownstein, doesn't want her book to be about
something as trifling and unimportant as sex. "My book isn't about sex,"
she says. "It's about unhappiness as it relates to the representation of
sex and the interaction of that in private lives."
Regardless, as she charts the history of sexual representation to the
present day, Anderson reveals that, in many ways, we are as repressed
and confused as ever.
"We have a culture where the representation of sex creates very
constricting images," she explains. "Supposedly we are liberated, we are
pluralistic, but the irony is that all this representation merely
provides us with new kinds of standards as related to sexuality:
standards of frequency, standards of creativity we should all be living
up to. Those who are happy have the ability to distance themselves from
these standards."
While Brownstein's travelogue, documentaries on the porn industry
like Paul Cowan's, and even Anderson's theoretical musings act partly as
distancing agents, looking on in a bemused, uninvolved way, cultural
pioneers from Berger to Choise to Wheately to Michael Turner don't
hesitate to jump in feet (or some other part of the anatomy) first. At
the same time, these more querulous works are not entirely optimistic;
at their heart they portray a profound pessimism and even futility. They
seem to be asking: where have the sexually explicit cultural pioneers of
the past, the DeSades, Annie Sprinkles, Georges Batailles and Larry
Flynts brought us? Is society less repressed, profit-motived,
hierarchical or cruel now then two hundred or twenty years ago? Working
as they are in the aftermath of the sexual revolution, younger creators
seem concerned with political and economic hierarchies as much as they
are motivated by breaking down increasingly fragile sexual barriers.
Berger recounts how one woman reader construed Lie With Me as an epic
battle waged against the still powerful vestiges of embarrassment and
shame conflicting with the female libido. How did the author feel about
the interpretation? "I don't know," she shrugs. Like others in this new
generation of cultural pioneers, she is neither willing to reduce her
narrative to just another skirmish for sexual freedom, nor prepared to
admit that the last century's cultural struggle for the freedom to do
and show just about anything is completely over.